Understanding repeatability and accuracy in flowmeters

Liquid flow measurement specialist, Titan Enterprises, outlines the roles of repeatability and accuracy in flow measurement devices.

The demand for high-accuracy meters in flow measurement has indeed grown over the years, driven by various factors such as stricter government regulations and the need for more precise measurements in critical applications.

Manufacturers of flow measurement devices like Titan Enterprises are continually investing in research and development (R&D) to introduce new technologies that enhance the accuracy and performance of their flow measuring instruments. This includes innovations such as improved sensor technology, advanced signal processing algorithms, and enhanced calibration methods.

An important element of Titan Enterprises’ R&D is reviewing the performance of its flowmeters and delivering improvements in product design and materials that increase both the accuracy and repeatability (or reliability) of these flow measurement devices.

The academic and flow measurement expert Roger Baker states “A high-quality flowmeter, carefully produced with a design and construction to tight tolerances and with high-quality materials as well as low wear and fatigue characteristics, is a precise meter with a quantifiable value of repeatability.”

Repeatability and accuracy are distinct terms used to define the performance and quality of a flowmeter.

What is repeatability? 

The standard description of repeatability in this context is the flowmeter’s ability to produce the same result on repeated runs under identical operating conditions. Repeatability is often something that the design of the instrument defines, and without excellent repeatability, a flowmeter cannot deliver reliable measurements.

Titan Enterprises sets its calibration rigs to record a certain number of pulses depending on the type of meter. The flow rigs accurately interpolate the rig and meter pulses and will not accept a reading unless it is within pre-set limits, usually set at 0.1% of repeated points. Repeatability is expressed as a ± percentage.

Repeatability can deteriorate at low flow rates, so manufacturers may specify this value as a percentage plus a constant uncertainty value or as a percentage of full-scale reading, rather than a percentage of the measured flow rate.

Titan’s highly repeatable small turbine flow meters are successfully employed in batching processes and dispensing applications particularly within the food and beverage, chemical, medical and laboratory sectors. They have excellent repeatability (±0.1%), making them ideal for dosing systems, and can be calibrated in situ.

What is accuracy?

The accuracy of a flowmeter relates to the quality of the measurement device and how close a measured reading is to the true flow. It is generally accepted that accuracy is used as a qualitative term, whereas linearity and uncertainty measurements are the quantitative terms defining the accuracy of a flowmeter.

Linearity is usually defined by stating the maximum deviation of the reading over a stated flow range (e.g. ±1% of flow rate). It is the ability of the flow meter to remain within specified limits over its entire flow range determined by its design. The standard way of expressing linearity is the error of reading. A frequently used alternative in some industry sectors is the percentage of full-scale deflection or FSD.

Measurement uncertainty is the level of potential error in calibration, i.e. the range of values within which the true values lie with a specified probability. It is accepted that there is always a margin of error in any taken measurement, and this uncertainty is quantified as a ± percentage.

Accurate flow rate measurement is influenced by an array of variables, including pressure, temperature, density and viscosity of the fluid. All of these factors are typically included in a calibration record. The very best calibration houses claim a measurement uncertainty as good as ±0.02%, though more typically ±0.1% when these factors are properly controlled.

Overall, the trend towards higher-accuracy flow meters is likely to continue as industries evolve and the demand for precise measurements in critical applications grows. This evolution is driven not only by regulatory requirements but also by the ongoing pursuit of process optimisation, efficiency gains, and improved product quality across various sectors.

flowmeters.co.uk

James Burke
James Burke
James Burke is Publication Manager at MEPCA Magazine, overseeing the title's print and digital publishing across news, features and advertising. He works closely with manufacturers, suppliers and engineering partners to bring MEPCA's coverage to maintenance and production professionals across the UK.

Related Articles

FEATURED VIDEO

LATEST ISSUE

- Advertisements -



Latest News